About

Oregon Green Energy Guide

This green energy resource guide is an attempt to aggregate and survey information on sustainable energy in Portland and Oregon.

Preface

This report is the personal project of the author, Sam Churchill, who has no particular expertise in this field. The motivation is simply to create an overview of trends and developments in sustainable energy as they relate to Portland and Oregon. No compensation of any type was involved. I generally support the goals of sustainability, although I’ve attempted to minimize any point of view here.

This WordPress site acts as a backup to my original work on Portland Wiki, where I created their Green Industry in Portland section from 2010-2012.

Utility-scale, alternative power in Oregon and Portland, solar and wind energy providers, and green building leadership in Portland are overviewed here, but many smaller “green” or sustainable-focused firms have not been listed or described.


Oregon Green Energy Guide

Table of Contents

Introduction

Oregon and Portland is becoming a green energy hub, [1][2] with utility scale energy generation using Wind, Solar and Wave, investments in electric car charging infrastructure, batteries and inverter technology, and a green building hub providing leadership nationwide.

The Pdx Economic Development Cluster Study shows high growth in green energy. Advocates say renewable energy companies have invested $5.4 billion dollars in Oregon to date and the wind and solar industries have become a vital part of our economic fabric. Wind and solar projects by companies like Horizon Wind Energy, enXco and NextEra have brought hundreds of construction jobs to Oregon and millions of dollars of tax revenues to rural communities.

In 2007, the Oregon Legislature enacted the state’s Renewable Portfolio Standard, a rule requiring the state’s largest utilities to generate at least 25 percent of their power from renewable sources like wind and solar.

Governor Kitzhaber’s 10-year energy plan draft would take renewables, efficiency and green transportation from the marginal to the mainstream, all in the name of lower greenhouse gases, energy security and jobs, reported the Oregonian in March, 2012.

Business Oregon, the state’s economic development agency, has closely tracked “green” jobs since 2009, says agency director Tim McCabe. Oregon topped the nation in a new Clean Jobs Index, reports Sustainable Business Oregon.

The Clean Jobs Index for Oregon is compiled from 4 categories. Each category begins as 25% of the Clean Jobs Index.

Skeptics

Skeptics of renewable energy investments say the government should not be in the business of making bets. They site examples like Solyndra, which went bust soon after the federal government pumped more than $500 million into the solar start-up.

Critics may have a point. SoloPower, a solar energy startup that received millions in incentives to open a Portland manufacturing plant, is suspending operations in North Portland by the summer of 2013, barely a year since it commenced operations.

Portland’s two marque green energy businesses, SolarWorld and Vestas have recently suffered downturns. SolarWorld, the German crystaline solar panel manufacturer, which has operated a taxpayer-subsidized factory in Hillsboro, is under severe price pressure by the Chinese, while wind turbine powerhouse, Vestas, was hammered by a plunging stock price, and lost its lead in global wind turbine market share. Like many industries, they experience economic fluctuations.

Oregonians for Sound Fuel Policy is one of over 15 front groups that purport to represent the views of concerned citizens and the broader business community, but funded by Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell, ConocoPhillips, BP, and others.

Economic Rationale

Green energy advocates say Oregon has what it takes; the silicon processing expertise, the wind, the waves, and a massive regional power distribution network. It’s a natural fit.

Electricity is a strong focus of sustainability efforts because it is cleaner and more sustainable than burning fossil fuels. Moving from coal-powered electric power generating plants to solar and wind-powered alternatives is one thrust. Moving cars to electricity or alternative fuels like ethanol using corn or wood fiber is another thrust. A third thrust, of course, is conservation.

These initiatives, it is argued, can be justified on both economic and environmental grounds, and constitute sound policy.

The average U.S. household uses about 10,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity each year, reports Sustainable Business Oregon. Photovoltaics and wind turbines, installed on residences or businesses can generate as much as 20-30% of the average daily demand. A typical residential solar array is 3-5 KW, while the average residential and small business wind projects are about 10 KW in size. Solar, of course, only works while the sun shines and wind turbines are dependent on wind.

It’s a tough sell without tax incentives and kickbacks. Oregon has some of the cheapest electric rates in the nation.

Oregon is one of seven states that offers incentives of $2 per watt or more. Federal tax credits, combined with cash incentives from Energy Trust of Oregon and the state Oregon Business Energy Tax Credits allow developers to recover most of the cost of installation in just a few years.

The Portland Development Commission is focusing on three core clusters within the cleantech industry, reports Sustainable Business Oregon.

  • Clean energy, with a focus on wind- and solar-powered generation.
  • Green development, which includes both green building technologies and energy-efficiency retrofits.
  • Electric vehicles and the associated sectors, which includes energy storage.

For clean energy, the region’s big players, are SolarWorld and Vestas. For green development, the PDC will continue to promote the building of the Oregon Sustainability Center, and for the electric vehicles, PDC will work with Drive Oregon and development-focused businesses such as Swiss battery technology company ReVolt.

Research firm Clean Edge surveyed more than 3,500 data points and 70 major indicators drawing from both municipal and private data sources to evaluate all 50 states in the U.S. for how well they did on policy, technology, and capital when it came to green tech. Oregon came in second, after California.

http://portlandgreenenergy.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/clean_tech_revolution.jpgRon Pernick, founder of Clean Edge, literally wrote the book — The Clean Tech Revolution a 2007 book that proclaimed that commercializing clean technologies is a profitable enterprise. He highlighted eight major clean technology sectors: solar power, wind power, biofuels, green buildings, personal transportation, the smart grid, mobile applications, and water filtration.

Pivotal Investments created a list of future clean-technology leaders with a mix of early-stage entrepreneurs, investors and senior executives leading the charge in the Northwest.

Green businesses, say proponents, benefit Oregonians by bringing jobs and money here. The jury may still be out on longer term results, but it’s undeniable that a large number of solar, wind and wave businesses, as well as related “green industries” have recently moved into Oregon and Portland.

World energy consumption keeps going up, according to BP. Renewables accounted for 2.7% of global consumption in 2013, up from 0.8% a decade ago. But coal accounted for 30.1% of total primary energy consumption, the highest proportion since 1970, suggesting a prioritisation of cheap rather than clean sources of energy.

Climate Change Science

There is another motivation for green industry; the sustainability of our environment and life style.

Former U.S. Treasury Sec. Henry Paulson, who was in office when the economy collapsed in 2008, says climate change is the biggest risk of our time. Paulson co-chairs the Risky Business Project, a nonpartisan business group focused on the issue and addressed the Portland City Club on the economic impacts of climate change.

James Hansen’s global climate models has contributed to the understanding of the Earth’s climate.

The Kyoto Protocol had two commitment periods, one from 2005-2012, and the second 2012-2020. The US has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol. The United States and China have agreed to intensify efforts to address climate change and seek common agreement.

Sam Avery, author of The Pipeline and the Paradigm, warns that there’s enough carbon in the tar sands “to send Earth’s climate into an irreversible tailspin.”

“The world has agreed that we have to keep climate change within two degrees centigrade.

And we have five times as much fuel as we need to do that right at our fingertips, proven reserves. We used to think, years ago, that we were going to run out of fossil fuel; we’re going to run just about the time that we really need to get off it for climate reasons.

But that’s not going to happen; we’re not going to run out.

The economy is not going to solve this problem for us. It’s not going to price fossil fuel out of the market. We are going to have to decide where, when, and how we’re going to stop burning this fuel.”

The Alberta Tar Sands, North Dakota’s Bakken Oil Shale formation and the Powder River Coal Basin in Wyoming and Montana will give us energy independence. But at what cost?

In 2011 the global economy emitted 32.6 billion metric tons of carbon pollution, reports the NY Times. The United States was responsible for 5.5 billion tons of that (coming in second to China, which emitted 8.7 billion tons). Within the United States, electric power plants produced 2.8 billion tons of those greenhouse gases, while vehicle tailpipe emissions from burning gasoline produced 1.9 billion tons.

File:350.pngCoal-fired power plants and fossil fuel are the biggest contributors to global warming. Global warming is caused by releasing what are called greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. The most common greenhouse gas is carbon dioxide.

350 parts per million is what many scientists, climate experts, and progressive national governments are now saying is the safe upper limit for CO2 in our atmosphere. The current level is 392 parts per million. 350 PPM is supposedly the number humanity needs to get back to as soon as possible to avoid runaway climate change.

Barack Obama’s American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 included more than $70 billion in direct spending and tax credits for clean energy and associated programs. While only 3 million Americans can beat grid prices with $3.50 per Watt solar and no incentives, 41 million Americans can beat grid prices using the 30% federal tax credit.

Hydroelectric dams in the Columbia River Basin account for one third of all the hydroelectric capacity in the United States, according to the US Energy Information Administration, although hydro accounts for only 8.4% of power production nationwide.

According to the US government’s 2013 Energy Infrastructure Update (pdf), renewable energy sources (i.e., biomass, geothermal, hydropower, solar, wind) have accounted for more than a third of all new electrical generating capacity in 2013.

One Response to About

  1. azleader says:

    An outstanding, comprehensive compilation of Oregon green energy resources!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s